Skip to content
Prices
  • BTC$81,737▲ 0.88%
  • ETH$2,388▲ 0.78%
  • BNB$723.75▲ 1.80%
  • XRP$1.29▲ 1.92%
  • SOL$103.95▲ 1.97%
  • TRX$0.3310▼ 0.27%
  • HYPE$78.44▲ 1.54%
  • DOGE$0.0789▲ 2.04%
  • LINK$11.92▲ 1.45%
  • ADA$0.2166▲ 0.48%
  • AVAX$9.55▲ 0.46%
SecurityNewsBuying guide

AnchorWatch opens bitcoin custody with up to $370M insurance

AnchorWatch Trust Company opened as a Nevada-chartered bitcoin custodian with two key-control models, fees capped at $10,000 a month and Lloyd's-backed cover.

· · 3 min read

Share
The Lloyd's building in the City of London, home of the insurance market behind AnchorWatch's policies (illustrative photo)
Image: Fred Romero from Paris, France / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

Quick verdictFlagship custody keeps the client closer to its own keys; the multi-institution model spreads control across three firms. Both can carry Lloyd's-backed insurance.

Jump to the verdict ↓
On this page

AnchorWatch Trust Company opened on Monday, Oct. 19, as a Nevada state-chartered trust company and qualified custodian for bitcoin, offering flat-dollar custody fees capped at $10,000 a month and optional insurance with limits of up to $370 million per client. The launch was reported by The Block and detailed in the company's press release.

What launched

  • Charter: the Nevada Financial Institutions Division has authorised the trust company to act as a custodian.
  • Target clients: fiduciaries, public companies, revocable and irrevocable trusts, and high-net-worth individuals who are required to keep bitcoin with a qualified custodian.
  • Fees: fixed-dollar amounts tiered by vault size rather than a percentage of assets, with a cap of $10,000 a month. Above the cap, more bitcoin or a higher price does not raise the fee.
  • Track record: AnchorWatch says its Trident Vault has held customer bitcoin for 20 months, has been audited or reviewed by Halborn, Doyensec and Lloyd's technical underwriters, and that the firm has completed a SOC 2 examination.

The two custody models compared

Flagship custodyMulti-institution custody
Who holds keysAnchorWatch holds the keys needed for qualified custody; the client's trustees or executives hold extra keysKey control split between AnchorWatch, BitGo (US) and CoinCorner (Isle of Man)
Main ideaClient keeps a direct role in signingNo single institution controls the coins
InsuranceOptional, in the client's nameOptional, in the client's name
Fee modelFixed-dollar tiers, capped at $10,000/monthFixed-dollar tiers, capped at $10,000/month
Based on AnchorWatch's announcement. Final terms depend on onboarding and underwriting.

+ Pros

  • Predictable fees that do not grow with the bitcoin price above the cap
  • Insurance written in the client's own name, including violent coercion and kidnapping
  • A choice between client-held keys and three-institution key control

− Cons

  • Insurance is only for US-domiciled companies, their US subsidiaries and US residents
  • Cover is subject to underwriting approval, exclusions and limits
  • More parties in the signing setup means more operational coordination

What the insurance covers

AnchorWatch is a Lloyd's of London coverholder, which lets it write policies backed by A+ rated Lloyd's syndicates. It says the cover can protect against bitcoin losses from several perils, including violent coercion, kidnapping and fraud by AnchorWatch itself. Its pricing page lists premiums from $4,000 per $1 million of coverage a year and a minimum policy of $250,000. Physical attacks on holders are a real risk, as the recent Bristol home-invasion case showed.

Our verdict

It depends on who you want holding the keys

Organisations that want their own executives involved in signing may lean towards flagship custody; those that worry most about any single company failing may prefer the multi-institution setup. For individuals, our guides to storing crypto safely and hardware wallets explain the self-custody alternative.

This article is for information only and is not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; do your own research. Read our disclaimer

Share

More from Security

View all →

Read next