Skip to content
Prices
  • BTC$79,591▼ 0.91%
  • ETH$2,302▼ 1.39%
  • BNB$737.38▲ 0.07%
  • XRP$1.28▼ 1.10%
  • SOL$100.78▼ 0.20%
  • TRX$0.3304▲ 0.42%
  • HYPE$77.15▲ 0.95%
  • DOGE$0.0768▼ 0.14%
  • LINK$11.40▲ 0.07%
  • ADA$0.2033▼ 0.48%
  • AVAX$8.88▲ 0.57%
DeFiNewsQuick take

S&P Global closes OpenZeppelin deal, bets on code risk

S&P Global has completed its purchase of smart-contract security firm OpenZeppelin. Terms are undisclosed; OpenZeppelin Contracts stay free and open source.

· · 2 min read

Share
55 Water Street in Lower Manhattan, the office tower that houses S&P Global's headquarters
Image: Kidfly182 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
As more of the financial system moves onchain, market participants need a clear view of the technology risk that sits beneath the assets they hold.
— Yann Le Pallec, President, S&P Global Ratings
On this page

S&P Global has completed its acquisition of OpenZeppelin, the security firm behind the most widely used library of Ethereum smart-contract code, the ratings and data giant said in a press release on Monday. The deal was first announced on Sept. 17; financial terms were not disclosed and S&P says it will not materially affect its results.

The facts

  • OpenZeppelin, founded in 2015, says its team has run 900+ security engagements and surfaced 10,000+ vulnerabilities before code went live.
  • Its open-source OpenZeppelin Contracts library underpins more than $38 trillion in value transferred, including many of the largest stablecoins and tokenized funds, according to the release.
  • It stays a separate business unit under its own name, led by founder Demian Brener, who reports to Yann Le Pallec, president of S&P Global Ratings.
  • Brener says the Contracts library will remain "open source, free and publicly maintained".

Our take: ratings meet code risk

The interesting part is where OpenZeppelin lands: inside the ratings arm, not a tech division. For years, a credit rating on a tokenized fund or a stablecoin said a lot about the assets and little about the smart contracts that move them. Most big DeFi losses, from bridge hacks to rug pulls, came from code and key management, not from bad collateral. An S&P-branded view of that "technology-risk layer" could become a box banks tick before touching on-chain products, much as credit ratings are today.

Two things are worth watching. First, whether the free library really stays neutral now that an incumbent owns its maintainer; the promise is explicit, and developers will hold S&P to it. Second, whether audits under a ratings brand create a new kind of conflict, since issuers already pay for ratings. For DeFi users, nothing changes overnight: an audit lowers risk but never removes it, as our DeFi explainer stresses.

This article is for information only and is not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; do your own research. Read our disclaimer

Share

More from DeFi

View all →

Read next