Skip to content
Prices
  • BTC$81,349▼ 1.92%
  • ETH$2,380▼ 2.58%
  • BNB$726.69▲ 0.03%
  • XRP$1.29▼ 1.83%
  • SOL$103.89▼ 1.75%
  • TRX$0.3319▲ 0.27%
  • HYPE$78.30▼ 2.31%
  • DOGE$0.0789▼ 1.28%
  • LINK$11.90▼ 2.21%
  • ADA$0.2152▼ 2.46%
  • AVAX$9.43▼ 3.48%
RegulationNewsExplainer

GENIUS Act rules: what the Blockchain Association wants

As comments on Treasury's GENIUS Act stablecoin rule closed, the Blockchain Association asked for narrower DeFi, liability and foreign-issuer duties.

· · 3 min read

Share
The US Treasury Building in Washington, D.C., with the statue of Albert Gallatin in front (illustrative photo)
Image: Tony Webster / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

The Blockchain Association has asked the US Treasury to draw tighter lines in its draft rules for the GENIUS Act, the stablecoin law signed last year. In a 26-page comment letter filed on Monday, Oct. 19, the industry group said it supports Treasury's goal of safe stablecoins from regulated issuers with adequate reserves, but that several definitions reach further than Congress intended, The Block reported.

What Section 3 does

Section 3 is the gatekeeping part of the law: it decides who may issue, offer and sell a payment stablecoin to people in the US, and what platforms must check before listing one. Treasury's proposal fills in the detail. Public comments closed on Monday with 123 submissions on the federal portal, and the act is expected to take effect in January 2027. If you need a refresher on the asset itself, start with what a stablecoin is.

The four main asks

IssueConcern with the draftWhat the association wants
Who is a 'digital asset service provider'Could sweep in infrastructure and proprietary tradersOnly businesses serving customers; exclude self-custody software, validators and firms trading their own assets
'Knowing participation' in illegal issuanceCarries criminal penalties; scope unclearRequire actual knowledge plus substantial help coordinated with the issuer; ordinary secondary trading should not count
Foreign issuersOpen-ended due diligence on issuers platforms may never deal withLet platforms rely on regulators' public prohibition lists
Is the counterparty in the US?A 'reasonably believes' testActual knowledge and information gathered in the ordinary course
Based on The Block's summary of the Blockchain Association letter.

Why DeFi cares

On permissionless networks, the letter argues, a participant may "interact only with a wallet address" and learn nothing more about who is on the other side. A standard that expects platforms to form beliefs about a counterparty's location would push identification and geolocation duties onto software that cannot realistically meet them. That matters for the DeFi apps and wallets that route most on-chain stablecoin trading.

"Our letter seeks clearer lines so the final rule matches what Congress wrote," the association said on X.

What happens next

Treasury now has to review the comments before issuing a final rule ahead of the January 2027 start. All submissions are public on regulations.gov under docket TREAS-DO-2026-0496. The industry's influence over the law's rollout is also under scrutiny: last week the WSJ reported that former White House crypto adviser Bo Hines kept a stake in a firm paid by Tether while pushing the bill.

This article is for information only and is not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; do your own research. Read our disclaimer

Share

More from Regulation

View all →

Read next